Similar pictures can hide different specifications
Two suppliers can quote the same reference photograph and still be pricing different products. A photograph rarely defines the fabric, weight, construction, trims and finishing completely. Different assumptions can make the quotations difficult to compare.
Align the composition, fabric structure, weight direction and key measurements first. Then review collar, placket, seam and pocket details and whether labels and packing are included. Small construction differences may change the materials and operations involved.
Look at the quantity breakdown
The same total quantity concentrated in one style and color differs from a total split across several styles and colors. Artwork versions, material purchasing and packing separation also need consideration. Give suppliers the clearest practical breakdown for the quotation stage.
Confirm sampling charges and revision arrangements separately. Check whether the scope includes decoration development, requested testing or other requirements rather than looking only at the bulk unit price. Where a decision remains open, record the assumptions used for pricing.
Compare the delivery scope in the same table
Confirm whether transport, insurance, taxes and destination charges are included according to the agreed quotation terms. Comparing a unit price without understanding the scope can lead to a misleading budget.
A simple comparison table can list garment specifications, quantity allocation, decoration, packing, sampling, timing and delivery scope. First compare equivalent products and services. Then consider communication, sample results and the supplier’s ability to carry out the agreed order when choosing a proposal.